Cuil’s arrival on the search engine scene is has been a modest one, (Techcrunch defined their modesty as ’stealth mode’). It’s a brave step to venture into a world that giants like Microsoft haven’t yet been able to become category leaders in, and under scrutiny which seems to expect them to be as good or better than the competition from release.
Cuil hasn’t had the easiest of treatment by the press, most of whom (understandably) have concentrated on the fact that the founders are ex-Google as to be fair, everyone loves to hear the hint of discord amongst the Google ranks or that their ’secret algorithms’ may have been leaked. The repeated downtime since launch has also been picked up on as a negative sign of things to come, which is perhaps a little hasty.
The Google pedigree is something Cuil has up its sleeves, but doesn’t guarantee that it will make their product good, or more importantly, popular. We know how many people migrated [from agencies and media owners] to MSN when they launched, but regardless of how good their engine is, the audience did not follow.
It would be naïve to think that Cuil could be a Google beater from inception, more it’s the ideas behind Cuil that make it interesting. Here are five reasons we think Cuil could well be the future of search….
1. A Unique Database of URLS
Claimed to be in the region of 120 billion [v. Google's 1 trillion] but what is more important is the fact that this is the first substantial new database for a long time. Instead of the big 3 search engines [from an index size], we could well be looking at the big 4.
2. Unique Look & Feel
Cuil is very different to the mainstream engines. Results aren’t ranked in a linear fashion and for a start, they include images on the same pages as the site description, rather than keeping them separate as Google do currently. Visual search is exciting, and whilst it takes some of us back to the days of keyword banners, it has been something that many have speculated could do for search what the album cover scrolling function did for the ipod.
Seeing really is believing, and whilst the images on Cuil are small and several people have noticed that at the moment they don’t always match the brand they are being shown against ( but do the images in the Google news feed always click through to the story they are displayed against?) they link the search result text to the website you will land on if you click, and this is good – we’ve all clicked on a link to find that it wasn’t what we were expecting.
If they can fix the bugs then this is a great addition to their product. Cuil are not the first to do this, and sites such as http://www.searchme.com/ show that others are getting results, and users from this approach. Google have recently switched the orientation of the paid search listings post page one so that they are all above the fold in three neat columns. We are all used to seeing hierarchical results for search, but a new approach is always welcome and a visual one offers new ways to increase click throughs by clever site image optimization and management.
The layout also reaffirms why they are potentially a new engine to behold. Google’s success has lead all other engines to mimic the layout, effectively becoming Google clones. A radical redesign is a bold and exciting move.
3. Privacy Policy
Cuil don’t track their user’s search history, unlike most of the competition, because they say they don’t need to. Google don’t need to, they just choose to. Whilst we are outraged, when ISP’s track user behaviour, try to sell it or pass it to the authorities, we don’t leave Google because their track our behaviour. So this privacy sounds great, but will it actually be a USP for the average consumer - possibly…
4. Philosophy:
Cuil have one, and it’s a good’un.

They have a page dedicated to how they work and why.
Does Google? Google has always said it champions the user and that it’s advertising restrictions and quirks are all about making sure that the results shown are the most relevant to the searcher, but do things like lifting their trademark policy on May 5th increase the likelihood that the user sees the brand they are searching for in the listings for their query?
Cuil rather sweetly explains in its philosophy pages it’s approach to indexing the ever increasing volume of web pages,
Imagine if the phone company decided to stop listing infrequently called numbers in the phone book. Maybe no one phones your grandmother much, but if her friend from the old neighborhood wants to get in touch, shouldn’t her number be in the book? Cuil lists all the numbers, even the ones that aren’t called much. Because one day someone will need that number.
There’s a fair bit of the ‘Innocent’ approach to consumer marketing in this statement, and it’s not the only place that echoes of their strategy come across in the way Cuil describe themselves, but what does the grandma bit mean for web masters and agencies alike? Does it mean that even if you don’t have to constantly reinvent the way you structure and optimize your SEO content to stay ahead of the competition for your relevant search queries?
5. Advertising:
None – yet. It took several years for Google to develop adsense, MSN & Yahoo are still working to make theirs as user friendly and expansive. Cuil’s backers will want to see a return, so it needs to bring in revenue -but how do you align paid search within their search pages? – will we see a tab for ‘sponsored listings’ appear at the top left hand side?
Half of making money from paid search is about the advertiser interface & capability, and it will be interesting to see whether their offering, if and when it comes is as unusual and innovative as their search engine.
In Summary
So, Cuil at launch is not the Cuil it has the potential to be in 5 years time. Google at inception was a work in progress and the volume of users and its search capability improved as it grew.
Google, circa November 11th 1998, courtesy of the Wayback Machine.
Cuil has some good features that make it a potential competitor to the others, or at least an engine to drive change amongst them. I hope that its critics can accept that there were always going to be glitches, but that as time progresses these will be ironed out.
What Cuil need now is to build their brand amongst consumers, because the site can be as beautiful and innovative as they like, with the best philosophy in the world, but without users what’s the point?
I hope that Cuil will grow and succeed, and if it does, it will mean advertisers and agencies alike will have to adapt to the Cuil philosophy. Maybe one day we’ll all be attending the Cuil Village Fete. Lets hope they don’t sell out!
Sphere: Related Content


5 Comments
Can’t help but disagree here guys and if this is a post for a reaction, then… well good on you!
1. The database is terrible… It doesn’t have my site. My site isn’t that important, but cripes, if the database is bigger than google’s then it should be in there.
2. The look is a car crash and is unusable… They WILL fold and change it. People don’t scan things in two dimensions - retailers know that consumers review products and prices along a single axis at a time.
3. Normal uses care not about Google’s privacy policy - only people spending too much time running search campaigns really care
4. The philosophy is pure icing - it means nothing without implementation (see point two)
5. Users don’t generally notice it’s advertising so won’t use cuil ‘because there isn’t any’.
Hi Jamie,i think Cuil might want to have a rethink about the algorithm which assigns images to listings.
A quick search for ‘broadband penetration’ amply demonstrates the semantic dissonance between Cuil’s robots and its unsuspecting users (who are at work!!)
I have to agree with Adam - I’m incredibly under-enthused by Cuil. So what if it has lovely pictures on the results? Searchsight.com has been doing this for a while.
Their keyword recognition tools seem very sub-standard as well - I typed in some of the most popular sites (visits and rank) on Google and Cuil failed just about every time.
Perhaps they’ll grow and improve but on first showing, it’s decidedly uninspiring and “so what”.
I cant believe that cuil is still up and running, a terrible search engine that is worst than a school project for retarded kids. Seriously, operators should save what left of their dignities and shut it down, cant they hear the laughing from mountain view?
Two things spring to mind.
1. Brand.
There has been alot of hype about Cuil. This will draw people to Cuil and creates brand awareness. That in itself is a good thing, and hats off to whoever has been behind creating this hype. I think alot of it comes from the fact the creators are ex Google, but who cares.
2. Relevancy
The results I got from doing some of my regular searches, for an early release, to be fair are not that bad. Better than Dogpile or Delicious when they first came out. My only problem is that the way the results are laid out makes me feel like someone has poked me in the eyes with a sharp pencil. A bit of a blur.
However, bring it on, whether it is good, bad, successful or unsuccessful, we need players like Cuil to move the search market forward. Surely Google cannot be King forever.
One Trackback
[...] and it works better and seems to give better (and more interesting) search results than Cúil (the new search engine kid on the block that claims to have a database many times bigger than Google’s). It even allows you to search [...]